Working as a homeopath for the past decade had enriched my life in inconceivable ways. One cannot put a price on being able to help oneself, family, friends, one’s animals with every complaint and illness that arises. This is quite apart from one’s professional practice where strangers approach homeopathy to draw help from it. My family have no health bills, we have no veterinary bills. At any time, a member of the extended families or any friend or associate can turn to me for homeopathic help. My personal health has completely transformed from the sick and lack-lustre child that I used to be. My immune system is resilient and strong.
But despite the obvious blessing the practice of homeopathy brings to the health of oneself and others, it is still described as ‘anecdotal’ and must be a quack-medicine. ‘Anecdotal’ is a scientific way of dismissing personal related experience and invalidating it. It is a strange and perverse way of turning reality into its opposite. Mainly on the premise, that it is only what everyone or what the majority experience as true that makes it real. Think Galileo, Leonardo da Vinci. But my intention here is not to get caught up in the conventional discourse around homeopathy.
I want to state that in my capacity as a homeopath, I have encountered scorn, condescension, mockery, laughter, derision, anger, astonishment, bewilderment, ignorance, challenge, apathy, indifference, disrespect and scepticism. I have no problem with healthy scepticism. I can respond to challenging debate if I so choose (there are many times when it serves no purpose other than a clash of egos). Some of my most sceptical patients became the sincerest advocates of the efficacy of this medicine. But I must admit that I have been shocked by attitudes here, which go way beyond the usual opposition to homeopathy which any homeopath hardens themselves to as a matter of course while they get on with their job. I have a problem with the undercurrent of shocking, personal disbelief and mud-slinging that seems to exist here. Perhaps this runs parallel to decreasing faith in all parts of life, and bitter cynicism caused by hardship and despair. People mock anything outside their own experience or belief-system, just because they find themselves justified by the ‘authority’ of current scientific understanding (which of course is always limited by future discoveries that have not yet occurred). It is just as well that science hasn’t yet informed us that love, joy, sorrow and emotional pain do not exist as they cannot be proven by a clinical trial although they have made a good attempt at trying to say these life-experiences are merely explained by chemical reactions in the brain. Some of homeopathy’s greatest detractors were sceptics who happened to be objective and therefore could allow their previous beliefs and knowledge to be shaken by new insights and a higher level of understanding. They were mature enough to do this as their ego diminished in proportion to what they realised they didn’t know as time went on, the deeper they delved into sickness and the more they realised their own personal limitations in their lives.
Homeopathy does not need belief in order to take effect. But to close oneself to it, is to block new possibilities for receiving a different kind of help. The most frustrating and painful obstacle that I have had to endure in this profession is facing the occasions where I know a person could be helped but they are closed to it and will not open themselves to receiving. And therefore my hands are tied. A broken heart can cause a person to avoid love, a person who scorns and repudiates the approach of love can isolate themselves from the very thing they need most in their inner being. A person who has learned not to trust, regards even the most worthy person as having an ulterior motive or a personal agenda which surely can have nothing to do with caring. A person who has not come across much altruism and principle will not hold out their hands to another and make the journey towards a better kind of life.
The lost potential for children to take a different road, for adults to have a different life merely from a simple ignorance due to the prevailing wrong convictions of society around them is the source of my greatest grief as a practitioner. For that there was no training which could prepare me. It is a constant struggle.